A study of efficacy of subcision, micro-needling and carbon dioxide fractional laser for treatment of acne scars

Authors

  • Ami Deepak Badheka Department of Dermatology, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat
  • Uzzaif U. Mansuri Department of Dermatology, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat
  • Rekha B. Solanki Department of Dermatology, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20161921

Keywords:

Acne scars, Microneedling, Dermaroller, Subcision, CO2 fractional laser, Acne, CROSS

Abstract

Background: Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin problem encountered in adolescents. Complication of acne may lead to scar formation. Types of acne scars are atrophic scars (ice pick, rolling scars and box scar), hypertrophic scar and keloidal scar. Multiple modalities for treating acne scars are chemical peeling, derma roller, subcision, punch excision, cryoroller, CROSS (chemical reconstruction of skin scars), fractional lasers, etc. This study is to study the efficacy of derma roller, subcision and CO2 fractional laser in acne scar and complications associated with them.

Methods: Total 45 patients with grade 2, 3 and 4 atrophic acne scar (Goodman and Baron grading system) were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned in three groups of 15 patients each. Group A: Derma roller, Group B: Subcision, Group C: CO2 fractional laser. 3 sittings at 28 days interval were done in each group. Evaluation was done by standardized digital photography pre-procedure and at each sitting. Physician’s evaluation was done in terms of excellent, good, fair, poor improvement or worsening. Patient’s self-evaluates as excellent, good, fair, poor improvement or worsening.

Results: According to physicians evaluation at the end of 3 sittings excellent response was seen in 20% (n=3), 13.33% (n=2), 6.67% (n=1) in group B, group C, group A respectively. According to self-evaluation by patient at the end of 3 sittings, overall, 44.44% (n=20) patients showed an excellent response (score of 8-10).

Conclusions: Time tested procedures; like subcision if done adequately and properly have excellent response and is comparable to newer and costly treatment like CO2 fractional laser.

 

References

Pandey SS. Epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol. 1983;28(3):109-10.

Rivera AE. Acne scarring: A review and current treatment modalities. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:659-76.

Goodman GJ, Baron JA. The management of postacne scarring. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:1175-88.

Poli F, Dreno B, Verschoore M. An epidemiological study of acne in female adults: results of a survey conducted in France. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol. 2001;15(6):541-5.

Layton AM, Henderson CA, Cunliffe WJ. A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19(4):303-8.

Cotterill JA, Cunliffe WJ. Suicide in dermatologic patients. Br J Dermatol. 1997;137:246-50.

Koo JY, Smith LL. Psychologic aspects of acne. Pediatr Dermatol. 1991;8:185-8.

Koo J. The psychosocial impact of acne: patients' perceptions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32:S26-30.

Jacob CI, Dover JS, Kaminer MS. Acne scarring: a classification system and review of treatment option. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45(1):109-17.

Wang CM, Huang CL, Hu CT, Chan HL. The effect of glycolic acid on the treatment of acne in Asian skin. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(1):23-9.

Erbagci Z, Akcali C. Biweekly serial glycolic acid peels vs long-term daily use of topical low strength glycolic acid in the treatment of atrophic acne scars. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39(10):789-94.

Fabbrocini G, Cassiapuoti S, Fardella N, Pastore F, Monfrecola G. CROSS technique: chemical reconstruction of skin scars method. Dermatol Ther. 2008;21(Suppl 3):529-32.

Cho SI, Kim YC. Treatment of atrophic facial scars with com¬bined use of high energy pulsed CO2 laser and Er:YAG laser: a practical guide of the laser techniques for the Er:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(12):959-64.

Khunger N. IADVL Task Force. Standard guidelines of care for acne surgery. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008;74(Suppl): S28-36.

Aust MC, Fernandes D, Kolokythas P, Kaplan HM, Vogt PM. Percutaneous collagen induction therapy. An alternative treatment for scars, wrinkles, and skin laxity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1421-9.

Smith KJ, Skelton HG, Graham JS, Hurst CG, Hackley BE Jr. “Increased smooth muscle actin, factor XIIIa, and vimentin-positive cells in the papillary dermis of carbon dioxide laser-debrided porcine skin,” Dermatologic Surgery. 1997;23(10):891-5.

Goodman GJ, Baron JA. The management of postacne scarring. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:1175-88.

Fabbrocini G, Fardella N, Monfrecola A, Proietti I, Innocenzi D. Acne scarring treatment using skin needling. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34:874-9

Fabbrocini G, Annunziata MC, D’arco V, Vita VD, Lodi G, Mauriello MC, et al. Acne scars: pathogenesis, classification and treatment. Dermatol Res Pract. 2010;2010:893080.

Alam M, Omura N, Kaminer MS. Subcision for acne scarring: technique and outcomes in 40 patients. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:310-7.

Sobanko JF, Alster TS. Management of acne scarring, part I: a comparative review of laser surgical approaches. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2012;13:319-30.

Cho SB, Lee SJ, Oh SH. Non-ablative 1550nm erbium-glass and ablative 10,600nm carbon dioxide fractional lasers for acne scar: a randomized split-face study with blinded response evaluation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24:921-5.

Alam M, Han S, Pongprutthipan M, Disphanurat M, Kakar R, Nodzenski M, et al. Efficacy of a needling device for the treatment of acne scars. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:844-9.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-03

How to Cite

Badheka, A. D., Mansuri, U. U., & Solanki, R. B. (2017). A study of efficacy of subcision, micro-needling and carbon dioxide fractional laser for treatment of acne scars. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 4(7), 2623–2629. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20161921

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles