Comparison of traditional and online education in airway management

Authors

  • Mümin Murat Yazıcı Department of Emergency Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Training and Research Hospital, Rize, Turkey
  • İsmail Ataş Department of Emergency Medicine, Rize State Hospital, Rize, Turkey
  • Enes Güler Department of Emergency Medicine, Kızıltepe State Hospital, Mardin, Turkey
  • Özlem Bilir Department of Emergency Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Training and Research Hospital, Rize, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20231312

Keywords:

Endotracheal intubation, Airway management, Medical education

Abstract

Background: Endotracheal intubation is commonly used to maintain the airway during airway management, but it requires skill and experience, so standard endotracheal intubation performed by beginner managers carries a high risk of failure. This study was conducted based on the hypothesis that there are differences between the traditional and online education models in terms of learning and skill development in situations requiring basic skills, and it aimed to compare the traditional and online education models to evaluate endotracheal intubation learning and skills.

Methods: This single-centre, prospective study aimed to evaluate the endotracheal intubation performance of volunteers. The research involved examining the endotracheal intubation experience of fourth-year medical school students who completed their education either traditionally or online at the Recep Tayyip Erdogan university simulation-based learning centre (RSIM). Approval was obtained before commencement from the local ethical committee (decision no. 2023/03, E-40465587-050.01.04-572).

Results: Mean time for successful intubation in the traditional and online education models evaluated was statistically significant at the non-difficult (p=0.005), moderately difficult (p=0.007) and difficult airway (p=0.014) levels.

Conclusions: Traditional and online education models affect endotracheal intubation ability. In endotracheal intubation with either a direct or a video laryngoscope, the traditional education model offered a more successful experience than the online education model. In addition, skills with the video laryngoscope were stronger in novice users than with the direct laryngoscope.

References

Wang PK, Huang CC, Lee Y, Chen TY, Lai HY. Comparison of 3 video laryngoscopes with the Macintosh in a manikin with easy and difficult simulated airways. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(2):330-8.

Parichehr NS, Mark S, Harald G. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:32-7.

Tam AY, Lau FL. A prospective study of tracheal intubation in an emergency department in Hong Kong. Eur J Emerg Med 2001;8:305-10.

Fathil SM, Mohd Mahdi SN, Che'man Z. A prospective study of tracheal intubation in an academic emergency department in Malaysia. Int J Emerg Med. 2010;21:233-7.

Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG. The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:381-4.

Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, et al. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:191-8.

Dolmans DH, Gijselaers WH, Moust JH, de Grave WS, Wolfhagen IH, van der Vleuten CP. Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research. Med Teach. 2002;24(2):173-80.

Jorge GR., Michael JM, Rosanne ML. The Impact Of E-Learning in Medical Education. Academic Med. 2006;8:3;207-12.

Ti LK, Chen FG, Tan GM. Experiential learning improves the learning and retention of endotracheal intubation. Med Educ. 2009;43(7):654-60.

Andresen M, Riquelme A, Hasbún P, Díaz C, Montaña R, Regueira T. Evaluation of competencies for tracheal intubation among medical students. Rev Med Chil. 2011;139(2):165-70.

Pedigo R, Tolles J, Watcha D. Teaching Endotracheal Intubation Using a Cadaver Versus a Manikin-based Model: a Randomized Controlled Trial. West J Emerg Med. 2019;21(1):108-14.

Boedeker BH, Bernhagen M, Nicholas TA 4th, Murray WB. Combined intubation training (simulated and human) for 4th year medical students: the Center for Advanced Technology and Telemedicine airway training program. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;163:71-3.

Pujari VS, Thiyagarajan B, Annamalai A, Bevinaguddaiah Y, Manjunath AC, Parate LH. A Comparative Study in Airway Novices Using King Vision Videolaryngoscope and Conventional Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation. Anesth Essays Res. 2021;15(1):57-61.

Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Schofield-Robinson OJ, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(3):369-383.

Tarasi PG, Mangione MP, Singhal SS, Wang HE. Endotracheal intubation skill acquisition by medical students. Med Educ Online. 2011;16.

Buis ML, Maissan IM, Hoeks SE, Klimek M, Stolker RJ. Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy: A systematic review. Resuscitation. 2016;99:63-71.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-29

How to Cite

Yazıcı, M. M., Ataş, İsmail, Güler, E., & Bilir, Özlem. (2023). Comparison of traditional and online education in airway management. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 11(5), 1509–1513. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20231312

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles