DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20175444

Haemolysis by urea: a simple method to improve quality of pre and post stained fine needle aspiration smears

K. Ankita Simon, Rasika Uday Gadkari, Sonali Dattar, Anuradha Vijay Shrikhande

Abstract


Background: Fine needle aspiration smears may contain large amount of blood which obscures cell morphology and cause inadequacy of smears in guided aspirates and highly vascular tumors. Resolving this problem can be done by urea.  Red cell lysis by urea is a simple technique without affecting the diagnostic material of smears or losing them during the procedure. To evaluate utility of urea solution for red cell lysis for improving the adequacy of prestained and Poststained smears.

Methods: For prestained and Poststained slides urea concentration, time of alcohol fixation and time in urea were standardized.  Ethanol fixed smears are placed in coplin jars containing urea solution and then transferred back to ethanol fixative and stained routinely. Stained smears coverslip is removed then placed in urea solution which are later transferred back to ethanol fixative and stained routinely. Conventional and urea smears are compared using scoring system by Mair et al.

Results: Urea treated smears had a cleaner background when compared with conventional smears with preservation of cell morphology in ethanol fixed smears. Stastical analysis showed significant improvement in adequacy of smears after urea treatment of smears.

Conclusions: The technique is reliable and applicable method to improve the adequacy of cytology smears.


Keywords


Hemorrhagic smears, Prestained smear, Poststained smear, Urea treated

Full Text:

PDF

References


Shabnam M, Sharma S, Upreti S, Bansal R, Saluja M, Khare A, et al. Comparative Study of Processing of Haemorrhagic Body Fluids by Using Different Techniques. JCDR. 2013;7(10):2186.

Dey P. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Interpretation and Diagnostic Difficulties. JP Medical Ltd; 2012.

Koss LG, Melamed MR, editors. Koss' diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006:1583.

Pieslor PC, Oertel YC, Mendoza M. The use of 2-molar urea as a hemolyzing solution for cytologic smears. Acta cytologica. 1979;23(2):137-9.

Kumar GL, Kiernan JA, editors. Education Guide-Special Stains and H and E: Pathology. Dako North America; 2010:142.

Kanai LM. Medical Laboratory Technology Vol III. 2nd ed. Tata McGraw-Hill Education;2013:1058.

Nachar, N. The Mann‐Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology. 2008;4(1):13-20.

Mair S, Dunbar F, and Becker PJ, Du Plessis W. Fine needle cytology: Is aspiration suction necessary? A study of 100 masses in various sites. Acta Cytol. 1989;33:809-813.

Kulkarni HR, Kamal MM, Arjun DG. Improvement of the mair scoring system using structural equations modeling for classifying the diagnostic adequacy of cytology material from thyroid lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;21:387-393.

Sattenspiel E. Cytological diagnosis of cancer in transudates and exudates: A comparison of the papanicolaou method and the paraffin block technique. Surg Gynaecol Obstet. 1949;89:478-84.